Hi Patricia,
Use below option and put values 1 & 1-, this will take only yesterday date. If you want to put 500 days in past till yesterday then put 500 & 1-. Try it and it will keep on rolling.
Regards
Rahul
↧
Re: COOIS - Dynamic Date Selection
↧
Re: Unable to convert the sender service BC_XXXXXXX to an ALE logical system
Now I have this problem:
Delivery of the message to the application using connection File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: An error occurred while connecting to the FTP server '...:21'. The FTP server returned the following error message: 'com.sap.aii.adapter.file.ftp.FTPEx: 550 Unexpected reply codeXI_ftp_00505687-3d59-1ed5-82f4-92d2d4422a0c.tmp: Operation not permitted'. For details, contact your FTP server vendor.
Regards
Norma
↧
↧
Check duplicate checking against parked document
Hello all, we have AP check duplicate activated and it has been working fine.
Recently we made a change to remove the check for document date. So now it does a more stringent 4-way check instead of the 5-way check that included date. I don't think this is the issue. Even when I turn on the Check Inv Date flag in OMRDC, it still does not work.
When I create a parked document, SAP is checking against itself. Here is the example:
FB60 - create vendor invoice manually. Enter all criteria. Park document # 123xxx is created
I go back to parked document - everything is fine so I try to post.
Error: Check whether document has already been entered under number 0010 123xxx 2015.
It is seeing it's own document.
This is an issue as we have a process where one person creates a parked document and another will check it and post it.
It also seems odd because everything I read about parked documents says that it doesn't do a duplicate check when parked, only when you try to post it.
Is there a way to turn off the check for parked documents? Or do I need to put a check in the FM: FI_DUPLICATE_INVOICE_CHECK? The FM already has a check sy-tcode ne 'FBVB'.
Many thanks,
Cheryl
↧
Re: Requesting Public Key from Server Communications error (14) Connection failed Ending transmission
Ashwin,
If your question has been answered, please mark this Discussion with a Correct Answer and Helpful Answer where appropriate. See http://scn.sap.com/community/support/blog/2013/04/03/how-to-close-a-discussion-and-why Even if you discovered the solution without any outside contributions, it helps others to understand what the solution turned out to be.
--Bill
↧
Re: SAP WEBIDE - Uncaught SecurityError
Hi,
Yes Cloud Connector is running . I did import bunch of applications from the Backend no issues .I am not seeing an 403 error but seeing an 404 error .When run the standard fiori application CA_FIORI_INBOX only seeing this Error .
Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)
https://webidetestingofh6jg-be55a3377.dispatcher.us1.hana.ondemand.com/resources/sap-ui-core.js Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)
@ sap-ui-core.js:27
I tired the Same app in fiori .got an different error
SCRIPT5: Access is denied.
File: preview_hidden.html, Line: 1, Column: 1
All other issues are not there anymore.
Thanks,
sree
↧
↧
Re: Actualizacion de Propiedades de Articulos
Muchas Gracias!!
↧
Re: BODS 4.x Architecture
Oops, good to know!
(is there any way I can self-delete or edit a post here? I don't see buttons to do so...)
↧
Re: Data Services 4.2 Extended Model
What happen if you manually set value for Transform type, then call
Can you get the value?
↧
Re: objects owned by a user in HANA
Thanks for that Amerjit!
Good job answering the question.
Cheers, Lars
↧
↧
Re: Transfer of Asset to different Asset Class with different Depreciation Areas
Hello All,
Asset is wrongly transferred in 2013, now in 2015 we are doing adjustments. As specified in SAP notes above we have made necessary configuration. Now Book depreciation is posted correctly but Income Tax depreciation is wrongly posted or Calculate.
for e.g. If Asset is purchased in 2013 for 100,000 Dep rate (Income Tax) is 4% SLM life of asset is 25 years. When we make transfer then Income Tax depreciation should calculate on 100,000 but system is calculating on 92000 @ 4% SLM for remaining life i.e. 23. which is wrong. Kindly suggest how should i correct this.
Best Regards
KP
↧
Re: Currency conversion not calculated as per the Tables TCURR
Hi Mukthar,
As per your advise, I have checked value date field in OKEQ, it seems blank.
Kindly advise, how to break this problem ?... and how to advise to the user?
Mukathar:-Thanks for your guidance, you are trying to resolve from day one I had raised issue.
Thanks & regards,
Sreekanta.M
↧
Re: SAP Design Studio 1.5 (Export to PDF)
Hi subhash,
thanks for sharing your experience.
Let's hope it's gets resolved soon.
Regards
Fahad
↧
Re: You are not authorized to change products
Hello Gabriel,
I believe you need still authorization for object COM_PRD, maybe also COM_PRD_CT.
The ultimate way to find missing authorizations is to start trace with transaction ST01, carry out faulted operation, deactivate trace and investigate the log.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Dawood.
↧
↧
Production Order against material type
Hi PP experts,
I want to know that in particular plant for which material type the production order exists.How should I found the Production Order with material type.
Please explain.
Regards,
Sagar
↧
Outbound Warranty Cliam - CRM Service
Hi All,
I've created an outbound warranty cliam document (ZXWY) , which has two item categories (ITC1 - Outbound Wty Claim & ITC2 - Debit Memo Claim).
ITC2 item is created though item level action of ITC1.
Once the claim status is set to COMPLETED in header level then the corresponded item level status changes to 'Accepted By vendor'.
Then upon saving the document with COMPLETED status the claim document should be replicated to ECC with the partner function PY & BP as vendor for settelment.
Issue 1- We are facing the given issue 'It is not possible to upload from mixed documents with scen. A activated' when we are trying to replicate the claim document with complted status.
Issue 2 - if we try to push the claim document with RELEASED status then the document it is getting replicated to ECC but the BP (Bill to Party & Payer) are getting updated as customer instead of vendor (In CRM the BP & PY are getting updated as VENDOR but when it is getting replicated to ECC all the four partner functions are updating as vendor.
Please suggest.
Thanks
Syam
↧
Re: SAP ABAP HANDBOOK BY KOGENT LEARNING SOLUTIONS
Rahul, There was some data migration in SCN and in between i lost that Blog. I need to re-write it.
↧
Re: Intercompany RRB billing
Hi Ashley,
1. I suggest having markup in SD pricing procedure.
2. See point 1.
3. Account assignment in the receiving Company code is the same for both markup and the cost. WBS never makes sense as characteristic for DIP profile.
Regards,
Paulo
↧
↧
Re: Batch job Failure email Alert
Hello Suri ,
You can setup the batch job failure mail alert through CCMS configuration in RZ20 with setting auto reaction method to concern mail id or distribution list .
Refer below link
Br Vaibhav
↧
Re: Smart form not getting triggered
Good point, vikram, although in this case wouldn't the short dump occur in the program calling the FM? I'm not sure, it doesn't happen to me frequently...
@OP - the standard billing output program uses FM LB_BIL_INV_OUTP_READ_PRTDATA to fill in the output interface structure. If you set a breakpoint there (or whereabouts), you should see the data that is sent to the form.
↧
Re: Resending a complete expense into ECC
Hi Kerry,
We had a simlar issue few weeks ago.
Normally if you want a new IDOC you need to make a reopen...but we had same problem.
Segments corrected were erroneous
Our work around was a manual posting in SAP with FB60.
Do not forget to adapt the reference in the header (BKPF-XBLNR) in the invoice so it matchs with your expense report
Then we send manually an IDOC back to CfTE for the confirmation by executing program DCFL_SEND_CONF_IDOC_TV
Re: Status "Released for reimbursement". Expense reports. (oss note 2052260)
If you have a better idea, please share
Nicolas
↧