Hi All,
i need to understand about the usage of cumulation class 32 Regular NIable pay & 33 Irregular NIable pay
i have searched it in SCN & sap help, but could not find information which can makes me to understand
i need to know about,
what is the purpose that we are using them
why do we have to use them or for which wagetypes that we have to enable them
if we enable them, what difference it make in terms of payment or deductions
waiting for your reply
Regards
Rahul
If you do not want to create a Custom Function, you (or an ABAP programmer) will need to create a Custom Operation.
Based on TM04 schema, pcr's TP09 & TP11, the time type 0000 is used for actual working hrs.
It would be advisable to check your time schema.
Pgm RPDASC00 is used for expanding the schema, with selection input: schema = PT schema (or for payroll PY schema), schema type 'T' (or "C" for payroll) and all other sel.fields = '*" (asterisk). Execute the pgm to display the fully expanded schema. Save it with a suitable name and current date, to indicate when it was generated/saved. This can be used to document schema/PCR changes and to reverse any change.
Also run time eval with log for a period when the employee has part day absence, IT 2003, etc. Check where normal attendance is added to a time type and reduced for absences, etc. Display CUMBT input/output to see the daily balances. You could also run PT_BAL00 before and after time eval to see the changes.
Hello,
1.
"Every time that Livecache is started the report SLCA_LCK_SYNCHOWNERS is executed."
- If you start the liveCache using LCA connection, for example - in LC10 transaction, and set this report as post-processing report in the Start liveCache section for LCA connection, then this report will run.
The actions of this report also included in the function of /SAPAPO/OM_DELETE_OLD_SIMSESS report:
954261 Function of program /SAPAPO/OM_DELETE_OLD_SIMSESS
which scheduled to run every 30min < recommended>, and the old locks from the lock server will be deleted in 30min or less after the liveCache will be restarted.
2.
"Starting the livecache with the different start options (LC10, report RSLVCSTART, from O.S level) this report is always executed?"
A. Review the document "Starting liveCache" at SAP MaxDB: The SAP Database - Documentation
- Starting liveCache - Database Administration in CCMS: SAP MaxDB - SAP Library
B. "As of SAP NetWeaver 720, STARTRFC is no longer included in the RFC SDK. For more information, see SAP Note 1581595 
. You can therefore no longer use STARTRFC to call these function modules."
Regards, Natalia Khlopina
Hi Ram,
Looks like the file DECORP F221.pdf has space in the filename and may not be storing in the file location.
Can you please check this attachment 145-2015.pdf with some while space in the filename like 145 2015.pdf? and if you are getting same error then probably that could be the reason.
let me know once checked if you see any more issues.
Thanks!
Praveen
Ram,
I would expect to see the apo availability screen for the non-mto item and nothing for the mto item since it is on delivery block.
Well, maybe. This depends upon how the delivery block is configured. OVLS. Just because an order or an item has a delivery block does not necessarily mean that availability check is also blocked.
The only possible misconception you have is where you say both materials are GATP enabled. This is not true; or you would not have gotten the ECC screen. Anytime you get the ECC screen, then that material is not GATP enabled.
Best Regards,
DB49
there is a enhancement ,the function module name is ”EXIT_SAPLV01Z_002“
Select some date range that is slow in your report. Then execute transaction SWI1 and set the same work item creation date range (and your tasks too of course). Is it slow? If yes, then you will know the that the slowness is caused by the select to SWWWIHEAD. There is not much you can do for this (except the indexes),
If it is not slow, then you probably have some issue with your join. In this case I would recommend you to take a serious look to the join and do something for it.
Also, if your workflow gets started at the same time as invoice gets created, you might replace the work item creation date with invoice creation date. You could first select the invoices from BKPF with creation date (if this is any faster), and then possibly find the work items related to the invoices from sww_wi2obj (or use the function that Rick mentioned). Now you would have the work item IDs => key to SWWWIHEAD => fast query.
Regards,
Karri
Issue is resolved. Thanks James.
>>Apr 18, 2015 9:05:45 PM [Error ]: The following problem has occurred during step execution: com.sap.sdt.j2ee.tools.spxmlparser.SPXmlParserException: /oracle/***/sapdata1/TT_stack.txt is not a valid stack definition file.<<
You provided the wrong stack file. In fact the xml version of the stack file should be supplied.
If you want to change the SP level then you need to recreate the stack file using the maintenance optimizer.
Check if there is an entry for the SCS01 in the /usr/sap/sapservices file.
Hi Raegan,
Thanks for your reply. I couldn't find the file you mentioned but managed to resolve this issue.
Basically the old profile files when it used to be a dual stack system still existed even though not used. Hence why SWPM thought it had a SCS01 instance. Once i renamed the files it went through.
Thanks for your time.
Closing this thread.
Dialnke
Hi Ravi,
It is possible to have a DSO for Goods Movements and Revaluations. If you want to use the classic Inventory Management scenario (using non-cumulative key figures), then you cannot use a similar approach with Stock Initialization. This is normally also not necessary since such a Stock Initialization reflects the current situation, i.e. should be possible using ECC. This has to go directly to the Inventory InfoCube.
Please review SAP Note 581778 - ODS capability of extractors from inventory management and the related SAP Notes carefully for more information.
Best regards,
Sander
This may be due to the employee being transferred from 25.4.2015 to a new org assignment; and for the details in IT 1, the pay scale grouping, etc does not apply; hence IT 8 needs to be copy/created from the transfer date with the relevant pay scale grpg, etc.
With transfer, the groupings, hol.calendar, WSR, etc also may change. Hence IT 7 also needs copy/create.
Normally transfer personnel action should include IT 7 & 8, so that the appropriate records can be created.
Sometimes HR/Payroll administrators skip the insertion of either/both of IT 7 & 8. This leads to problem in running time eval or/& payroll.
I have seen also some functions fail in payroll due to IT 7 & 8 not being in sync.
Hi Erika,
I suggest to move this discussion to a different Space, e.g. Business Intelligence or SAP BusinessObjects Mobile.
Best regards,
Sander
Hi Ariel,
I suggest to delete and reload data. However, it is not clear for me what kind of data flow it concerns.
If you could provide more information on the data flow, e.g. DataSource, DSO and InfoCube, then I am able to make it more specific to your situation.
Best regards,
Sander
Hi Tamas,
I don't think you are able to add a record to 0CUST_COMPC_ATTR while processing 0CUST_SALES_ATTR. If you want to add a record to 0CUST_COMPC_ATTR, then you have to do it here in Enhancement RSAP0001 or BAdI RSU5_SAPI_BADI.
Alternatively, you could create a Generic DataSource (e.g. Function Module) to fetch this specific group of Ship-to Parties. It will be even more transparent from a data staging perspective,
Best regards,
Sander
I let the Replication process ran for almost a day, it never stopped. Then I proceeded again to stop from CRR_CONTROL.
Restarted SUM Phase, and somehow it managed to continue, it stated it could not finish scanning file CSCRRLST_5, retry again and completed this phase.
mohan m,
You may like to see these statistics:
In last 6 months you had asked 40 questions, out of which you kept 36 still 'Not Answered.' Oldest and fully discussed threads also include this list. Please visit your Contentpage to see what you had asked so far and kept still open. Also you go through this blog How to close a discussion and why?
KJogeswaraRao
Grindhara,
If you are using SSO, too many factors to consider:
Regards,
Ajay